How long before the media fear machine goes into full effect over Iran?

Question by You’re a racist!: How long before the media fear machine goes into full effect over Iran?
It’s just getting started now, but how long before kids are practicing “duck and cover” and learning to “not look at the light from the blast” like the Cold War days?

Give your answer to this question below!

 

10 Comments on "How long before the media fear machine goes into full effect over Iran?"

  1. Mister2-15-2
    says:

    It’s been in the Day of the Knives mode a long time, as adjective Muslin was used instead of Marxist. It seems closer to WW1&2 propaganda than cold war stuff, but techniques are the same in both.

  2. J Q Public says:

    As long as it takes Israel to grease the wheels. Not long IOWs.

  3. Beavertailguy says:

    Ummmm gone rogue……WMD’s that was the sole reason given, over and over again. Even after the British U.N. observers said there weren’t any, over and over again.

    How did that work out for ya?

  4. Gone Rogue says:

    The United States invaded Iraq in 2003 with three goals: The first was the destruction of the Iraqi army, the second was the destruction of the Baathist regime and the third was the replacement of that regime with a stable, pro-American government in Baghdad. The first two goals were achieved within weeks. Seven years later, however, Iraq still does not yet have a stable government, let alone a pro-American government. This has everything to do with the Iranian backed Shia.

    After a 2006 defeat in the midterm elections, it was expected that U.S. President George W. Bush would order the withdrawal of forces from Iraq. Instead, he announced the surge. The surge was really not much of a surge, but it created a huge psychological surprise — not only were the Americans not leaving, but more were on the way. Everyone who was calculating a position based on the assumption of a U.S. withdrawal had to recalculate.

    With the United States gone, Iran would be the most powerful conventional power in the Persian Gulf. The historical balance of power had been between Iraq and Iran. The American invasion destroyed the Iraqi army and government, and the United States was unable to recreate either. Much of this had to do with the fact that the Shia Iranians did not want the Americans to succeed.

    Iran once fought a war with Iraq that cost Iran a million casualties (imagine the United States having more than 4 million casualties), and the foundation of Iranian national strategy is to make certain that Iraq becomes a puppet to Iran or, failing that, that it remains weak and divided. Iran does have the ability to prevent the formation of a government or to destabilize one that is formed. Iranian intelligence has sufficient allies and resources in Iraq to guarantee the failure of any stabilization attempt that doesn’t please Tehran.

    The solution to this dilemma would be to take out Iran’s government, a popular choice in the Middle East and among even Iran`s own people.

    The Iranian Government remains confident and defiant in the face of American pressure on the nuclear issue. They know that in spite of the fact that American Armies are on both the East and West borders of its country and could easily invade the new weak US President Obama will not. He has even announced the time line for withdrawal from Afghanistan using the opposite psychological strategy of the Bush administration.

    Soon Iran will have the bomb and when that point is reached there will never be another opportunity to destabilize Iran and she will easily dominate the whole Middle East.

  5. Kirby says:

    Is DIck Cheney still manipulating info.

  6. MOVING ON UP says:

    The Nut Job has been reduced to comic relief so they will poke fun at him.

  7. G S says:

    Iranian delivery systems cannot reach the continental US from Iran. However, Israel and Europe are reachable targets.

  8. ello puppet says:

    very soon imo

  9. brown9500v22 says:

    FOX ain’t the only channel, dewd.

  10. USA ALL THE WAY! says:

    Will they make money off it?

    They are all owned by corporations now. I don’t see them doing anything that would hurt profits.

Got something to say? Go for it!

Similar Questions


Why is there a stereotype that men are “simple” and women are “complex”?
Question by Tetsu Inoue: Why is there a stereotype that men are “simple” and women are “complex”? This stereotype is insulting to men. It seems to imply that we are “simpler” than women, more primitive. Tell me – if someone were to call you simple or complex, which would you rather be called? Complex, of …

For what situation we are using “having been” in English sentences?
Question by White Bell: For what situation we are using “having been” in English sentences? For what situation we are using “having been” in English sentences? What are the difference between “having been” and “have been” in English. In which context both can be used? Can anyone explain this in details? For example the last …

How often to you see a woman that is “perfect”?
Question by hieishin88: How often to you see a woman that is “perfect”? How often to you see a woman that is “perfect”? Someone that looks like theyd just fit you. not necessarily victoria secret model but someone that you see as perfect to you? for me id say about twice a year What do …