Q&A: Why have the liberals moved from Big Bird to Binders and now to “Romnesia”?

16 Comments on "Q&A: Why have the liberals moved from Big Bird to Binders and now to “Romnesia”?"

1. Leslie Goudy

   says:

   January 7, 2013 at 2:29 pm

   Big Bird was a stupid ploy and the Binder thing along with Eva Longoria’s crudity made the left look bad. Jon Stewart made an ass of himself. But why can’t you be objective about Romnesia. Even Newsmaxx carried that article. Romney is not a believable candidate. I think he and Ryan spell disaster for foreign policy with their lack of diplomacy. You know I wanted Ron Paul. But I am enough of a champion of the working class to vote for Obama in a clutch. That would be just another lame duck presidency until you guys could get someone like Rubio or Rand Paul in there. I would vote for them because we need a more realistic Fiscal Policy I don’t think Rand will make it because of his Dad. Neo Conservatives hate Ron Paul because he has their number for sure. They are destroying the Conservative base. I know you probably believe that Romney will listen to the Tea Party. If he gets in, I hope you are right. And I hope the Neo Con element will be in balance. But I doubt it. I want a country that isn’t a wasteland from war for my Grandchildren.

   Reply
2. WinonaGal says:

   January 7, 2013 at 2:02 pm

   Yawn.
   This is really getting boring. Time to get this election over and done with people.

   Reply
3. The Equalist says:

   January 7, 2013 at 1:32 pm

   You do realize there is an election?

   In the course of an election, one side is expected to say why the other side is a bad choice.

   It’s interesting that many Cons think that “Obama’s record” is fair game to attack during election season, but somehow we can’t attack Romney’s record because that means we’re “distracting from the issues” and “hiding from Obama’s record.”

   Obama’s record is a good one – not perfect – but on the right track. Romney would be a recipe for disaster.

   Reply
4. KJ says:

   January 7, 2013 at 12:46 pm

   Funny, when discussing with my Liberal friends they always seem to change the subject when Bengahzi comes up. They point to the moon, the stars, Romney’s tie, anything so that they do not have to discuss it. Sad fact, the truth is their enemy!!

   Reply
5. Judge Andrew says:

   January 7, 2013 at 12:09 pm

   distraction from the failures of socialist polices

   Reply
6. ms manners says:

   January 7, 2013 at 11:11 am

   Better than “what kind of name is Tagg?”, which is equally useless.

   My guess is that they share one brain, and that is why when one says something pointless, ten more repeat it.

   Yes..if Romney’s position changes he is flip flopping. If Obama’s changes, he evolved.

   Reply
7. magick says:

   January 7, 2013 at 11:00 am

   Jobs created , unemployment down ( in some places to 5 % ) , stock market headed for record levels , manufacturing slowly returning . Do you really want to go back to the Bush policies ?

   Reply
8. Elmer says:

   January 7, 2013 at 10:34 am

   ROMNEY: This — the administration — the administration indicated this was a reaction to a video and was a spontaneous reaction.

   CROWLEY: It did.

   ROMNEY: It took them a long time to say this was a terrorist act by a terrorist group. And to suggest — am I incorrect in that regard, on Sunday, the — your secretary –

   OBAMA: Candy?

   ROMNEY: Excuse me. The ambassador of the United Nations went on the Sunday television shows and spoke about how –

   OBAMA: Candy, I’m —

   ROMNEY: — this was a spontaneous —

   CROWLEY: Mr. President, let me —

   OBAMA: I’m happy to have a longer conversation —

   CROWLEY: I know you —

   OBAMA: — about foreign policy.

   CROWLEY: Absolutely. But I want to — I want to move you on and also —

   OBAMA: OK. I’m happy to do that, too.

   CROWLEY: — the transcripts and —

   OBAMA: I just want to make sure that —

   CROWLEY: — figure out what we —

   OBAMA: — all of these wonderful folks are going to have a chance to get some of their questions answered.

   Reply
9. udidenbuilddat says:

   January 7, 2013 at 9:44 am

   small issue distraction

   Reply
10. FLSwampBoy says:

    January 7, 2013 at 9:39 am

    If you don’t see the Right doing the exact same thing, then you’re not very objective.

    But, we already knew that…..

    Reply
11. Nathan says:

    January 7, 2013 at 9:36 am

    Big Bird and Binders were just digs at Romney, but Romnesia is a pretty big problem. It’s not good to have a president that changes his core beliefs based on the latest polling data. We generally know what Obama is about because he has had 4 years to show us what he does. We don’t have a clue who the real Mitt Romney is, or what he’ll actually do as president.

    Reply
12. Smoochie says:

    January 7, 2013 at 8:52 am

    Libs are constantly making asses of themselves. Since the beginning. It’s why their logo is a donkey.

    Reply
13. Joe says:

    January 7, 2013 at 7:53 am

    They need something to make Romney look like someone who should not be president, which is hard to do when their candidate is so over his head in his current position as president. Aslo, I think you have a good point on asking if Obama is the only one who can evolve. Why do people think that Romney can’t make the right decisions for the country which may not have been the best decisions for Massachusetts?

    Reply
14. American says:

    January 7, 2013 at 7:33 am

    They’re just making asses of themselves, and the world is watching.

    Reply
15. KevinM says:

    January 7, 2013 at 7:02 am

    Sun-ny days, sweeping O-Bama away. On my way, to where the President sleeps! Can you tell me how to get – how to get to Rom-n-ey Street?

    Reply
16. From See to Shining See says:

    January 7, 2013 at 6:57 am

    Bigger laughs.

    Reply