Question by .: In an election two un-named politicians from two un-named parties are running. Who would you expect to win if?
…one politician is running on the platform of “yes we can” and the other is running on the basis of “no we can’t. Who would win an election in this hypothetical situation?
Give your answer to this question below!

If “YES WE CAN” means yes we can:
Control your lives
Set your pay
Make you pay for your neighbors mortgage
Set your thermostats
Make you pay per mile you drive
Tax your kids out of a future
Put the burden of paying for everyone’s food, health, and shelter, on ME.
Associate with Dictators and terrorists.
Cut our Military defense budget.
Ignore the Constitution and Bill of Rights
Ignore the voice of “We the people”.
Print money to devalue the dollar.
Promote how bad America is.
Hate America first.
Put Veterans down and label them as potential domestic terrorists.
….and the list goes on and on and on and on.
Then I will vote for NO WE WON’T walk the plank of the D.C. Pirates.
I would expect the candidate with the best ideas to win, but in the real world this is not true. Take our president for as a prime example.
“Yes we can” because the words are with the intent that something will get done.
“No we can’t” means nothing will get done and nobody is going to vote for that.
Well,I doubt anyone would run on “No,we can”t”,however,just because someone says “Yes,we can”,doesn’t mean they will be any different. Politicians have been using “change ” in their campaigns for decades.
Right on Mrs. Cullen!
Yes we can would win. People like feeling empowered.