How many potential Iowan voters were disenfranchised in the 8 precincts that were “lost forever”?

Question by cargo pilot III Flyin’ Mayan: How many potential Iowan voters were disenfranchised in the 8 precincts that were “lost forever”?
After the Iowa GOP counted the votes in an undisclosed location, it was later discovered all the votes in 8 Iowan precincts were “lost forever”.

How many Iowans were disenfranchised in those 8 lost precincts?

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

 

8 Comments on "How many potential Iowan voters were disenfranchised in the 8 precincts that were “lost forever”?"

  1. bigboob
    says:

    how can they say who is the winner.

  2. Big One 0909 says:

    Not nearly as many as there will be Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders and Warner Bros cartoon characters if we start checking ID’s.

    They will have generally voted in a very similar fashion to the rest of them. It is not like there would have been any earth-shattering difference. Romney and Santorem were the two clear top dawgs in that pile.

    Which one was on top? Last week it ws Romnay, now it is Santorem. But do not worry, it NEVER was Rue Paul.

  3. Dawn of the Zombie g says:

    but… didn’t they have to show their ID when they voted?

    that eliminates ALL VOTER FRAUD FOREVER… so… you simply have to be wrong…

    lol…

    a majority of voter fraud happens AFTER THE VOTES ARE CAST… funny how cons ignore that part but focus on the voters…

  4. Willamette says:

    Yeah that’s messed up. How can that happen? Especially at caucuses where the votes are basically right in front of everyone’s faces. :/!

  5. Eric says:

    they were probably ron paul precincts too. karl rove and donald trump must have been in on it.

  6. At Least He Kept Us Safe says:

    I told you we should have just gone with the Purple Ink on the finger.

  7. Big Peter says:

    Typical of the Republicans. They engage in voter fraud but accuse others as a smoke screen.

  8. Rockefeller Republican says:

    Plenty.

Got something to say? Go for it!

Similar Questions


Why is there a stereotype that men are “simple” and women are “complex”?
Question by Tetsu Inoue: Why is there a stereotype that men are “simple” and women are “complex”? This stereotype is insulting to men. It seems to imply that we are “simpler” than women, more primitive. Tell me – if someone were to call you simple or complex, which would you rather be called? Complex, of …

For what situation we are using “having been” in English sentences?
Question by White Bell: For what situation we are using “having been” in English sentences? For what situation we are using “having been” in English sentences? What are the difference between “having been” and “have been” in English. In which context both can be used? Can anyone explain this in details? For example the last …

How often to you see a woman that is “perfect”?
Question by hieishin88: How often to you see a woman that is “perfect”? How often to you see a woman that is “perfect”? Someone that looks like theyd just fit you. not necessarily victoria secret model but someone that you see as perfect to you? for me id say about twice a year What do …